Eurocentric biases are dominate across various academic disciplines. they either deny the attribution to our culture or call it plain superstitious belief.
enlightening article on devastating effect of it by śri lankan biologist:
then the onus of proof lies with us to prove suśruta was indeed a great surgeon, whereas we never see Europeans giving evidence to establish that Euclid was a real man.
Following book by prof. CK Raju on Euclid is a worthy read for anyone who wish to learn how Academic Imperialism works to perpetuate the aforementioned biases.
Euclid and Jesus: How and why the church changed mathematics and Christianity across two religious wars
enlightening article on devastating effect of it by śri lankan biologist:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-of-co...
then the onus of proof lies with us to prove suśruta was indeed a great surgeon, whereas we never see Europeans giving evidence to establish that Euclid was a real man.
Following book by prof. CK Raju on Euclid is a worthy read for anyone who wish to learn how Academic Imperialism works to perpetuate the aforementioned biases.
Euclid and Jesus: How and why the church changed mathematics and Christianity across two religious wars
http://ckraju.net/Euclid/
https://www.amazon.com/Euclid-Jesus-mathematics-Christianity...
please do explore other work of prof. Rāju.