One man's propaganda is another man's truth, and vice versa. Do you really think the EPI is credible? https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/economic-policy-in...
> These are the orgs who persistently try to sell trickle-down economics
That's ironic, given that the phrase "trickle-down" was invented by leftists as a marketing tactic: https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/thomas-sowell-on-the-trickle-...
> low regulation
Well, we can agree on that one at least.
> and other discredited, disastrous, and irrational neoliberal policy argument
Never mind. I guess we have nothing to agree on.
> Many are also enthusiastic climate change denialists.
You're clearly influenced by the outputs of a propaganda industry, not the outputs of credible independent research. See what I did there? I'll even one-up you with some links:
https://www.amazon.com/Unsettled-Climate-Science-Doesnt-Matt...
https://www.amazon.com/Apocalypse-Never-Environmental-Alarmi...
https://www.amazon.com/Fossil-Future-Flourishing-Requires-Ga...
So yes, there is a ton of unacceptable plastic waste out there, but the net effect (he argues, anyway) is still overwhelmingly positive for the environment, particularly if we can focus eco efforts on ensuring that plastic ends up safely land-filled rather than being overly consumed with reducing the upfront production of it.
And one of the nice things about this approach is that it's not an uphill battle the way guilting people about their lifestyle choices is— you can work with NGOs to lift people around the world out of poverty, and a natural part of them becoming richer will be having the mental bandwidth to look around and demand things like a safe, well-organized waste processing pipeline.
[1]: https://www.amazon.ca/Apocalypse-Never-Environmental-Alarmis...
https://www.amazon.com/Apocalypse-Never-Environmental-Alarmi...
If you want a case, here's one of the books I mentioned [1]. It's not entirely perfect, but an example of how you can absolutely make a very valid, science-based attempt at a world-view that refutes many of the central tenets of modern climate change ideology.
Don't confuse me: carbon emissions are an important problem, one we need to solve. But you have decades of people like Gore to AOC to celebrities to even legit scientists, all on the left, who make claims like "we're X years from Y major catastrophe", and they end up wrong. Then you have corruption scandals, inaccurate models and stories of suppression of non-narrative-fitting data, and the democrats beating it over everyones heads constantly.
All I'm saying is this: it's very understandable that the Average Josephine on the right is skeptical. Any claim that says "the righties are dumb / purposefully ignorant" is missing an important piece of socio-cultural dynamics and rational game theory - having a distrust of an institution thats been intensely politicized is... fairly rational.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_c...
[1] https://www.amazon.com/Apocalypse-Never-Environmental-Alarmi...