Found 10 comments on HN
sorenbs · 2017-09-03 · Original thread
Eric schlossers Command and Control provide accounts of many 'close calls' in the US nuclear program

Highly suggest reading "command and control" by eric schlosser (fast food nation). Terrifying but amazing book:

I'm really not sure why we're still alive.

MichaelGG · 2017-03-12 · Original thread
That hasn't been historically true. It might be true for newer ones but older designs could have gone off. There's also incidents where the bomb was armed accidentally, say, by it slipping while in a plane. Some of the "intentional" detonators were very simple and could be triggered by a surge.


sorenbs · 2017-03-04 · Original thread
I highly recommend reading

Turns out the answer to your question is simply: luck.

rrggrr · 2016-06-23 · Original thread
Despite three major armed conflicts fought between nuclear powers by proxy, none thankfully have resulted in nuclear war. Deterrence works. What doesn't work, and a flaw that is growing exponentially with nuclear proliferation is failures in design, command and control. The incredible and incredibly frightening book "Command and Control" (see link at bottom), highlights several near catastrophic misses in the US nuclear arsenal. Now multiply by all nuclear states, the risks of accident are terrifying. The world would do well to open source safeguards so that even rogue states (eg. North Korea) can benefit from control and process that mitigate risk of unintended nuclear detonation.

avar · 2015-09-14 · Original thread
You left out the worst incident I know of:

The US was one arming switch away from nuking North Carolina in 1961. This and a bunch of other really scary nuclear-related accidents are covered in Command & Control:

justizin · 2015-04-09 · Original thread
Command and Control, a historical account of failures in safety and other procedures with america's nuclear arsenal:

rrggrr · 2015-02-02 · Original thread
"I think the fears about “evil killer robots” are overblown. There’s a big difference between intelligence and sentience. Our software is becoming more intelligent, but that does not imply it is about to become sentient."

It is the period between sentience and "advanced" artificial intelligence that should be worrying for two reasons: First, it is close at hand. More importantly, the unintended consequences of tech are never well thought out in the initial stages of adoption.

I'm reading Eric Schlosser's book on the early days of nuclear weapons and the many, many near misses the US experienced as it adopted nuclear arms without much thought to risk management. I see parallels in the race to develop and deploy pre-sentient A.I. Link below to Schlosser's book.

cmsmith · 2014-11-08 · Original thread
For those who are still interested after reading the article the information is taken from the author's book [1], which I just finished and thoroughly enjoyed/was terrified by.


timr · 2014-05-26 · Original thread
The SAC had plenty of nasty screw ups, including littering large areas of Spain and (iirc) Greenland with plutonium dust from nuclear weapons accidents. It's also pretty much dumb luck that we've never had an accidental detonation of an SAC-controlled nuclear weapon:

Get dozens of book recommendations delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday.