Somewhere in my book collection is H2O - A biography of Water, by Phillip Ball, one of the Nature editors.
The first half of the book is general background on the weirdness and uniqueness of water compared to other liquids of its class, but the latter part of the book is directly purely at explaining and dismissing a lot of the claims presented in Homeopathy.
I'm not certain if he was directly involved with the disclaimers surrounding the original article, but it wouldn't surprise me, given the vehemence in his later writing.
The first half of the book is general background on the weirdness and uniqueness of water compared to other liquids of its class, but the latter part of the book is directly purely at explaining and dismissing a lot of the claims presented in Homeopathy.
I'm not certain if he was directly involved with the disclaimers surrounding the original article, but it wouldn't surprise me, given the vehemence in his later writing.
Amazon Link (hopefully non-referral, unless google has tricked me): http://www.amazon.co.uk/H2O-Biography-Water-Philip-Ball/dp/0...