Interesting. This seems to be the licensing equivalent of "Piracy is Progressive Taxation", which is an angle on software licensing I hadn't considered before (and it should have, since these are copyright licenses, and similar popularity-based dynamics regarding violation of norms ought not to be surprising):
https://www.oreilly.com/content/piracy-is-progressive-taxati...
Tim O'Reilly wrote a post in 2002 titled "Piracy is Progressive Taxation"[0]. Basically, the conclusion he came to after analyzing the data is that on average, piracy stimulates demand enough for net gain in sales for publishers, but it isn't distributed evenly: works in the fat head (eg. bestsellers, blockbusters, etc.) see a very small net loss (ie. for the most popular content piracy may displace sales a bit), but for everyone else it is a net gain, and the gain is bigger the less popular the content is.
[0] https://www.oreilly.com/content/piracy-is-progressive-taxati...
For what it's worth, Tim O'Reilly notes, in "Piracy is progressive taxation"[0], that:
>> Obscurity is a far greater threat to authors and creative artists than piracy.
[0]: https://www.oreilly.com/content/piracy-is-progressive-taxati...
Tim O'Reilly agrees with you:
https://www.oreilly.com/content/piracy-is-progressive-taxati...