A good place to start may be with the book by Daniel Dennett: Intuition Pumps And Other Tools for Thinking https://www.amazon.com/Intuition-Pumps-Other-Tools-Thinking-...
Similarly, it's great to read good science books with careful arguments. One of the best I think is Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South https://www.amazon.com/Culture-Honor-Psychology-Violence-Dir... -- the authors use a variety of independent experiments to make their conclusions.
In general, it's probably worth learning a bunch of psychology too - to understand others better (along with the variety of cognitive biases people have). A classic book in this direction is Dan Ariely's Predictably Irrational https://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expand...
there are two great books I recommend for those interested: predictably irrational [1] and the upside of irrationality [2]. personally, I think the first is better than the second as a layman's introduction to it.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_economics
[1] https://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expand...
[2] https://www.amazon.com/Upside-Irrationality-Unexpected-Benef...
It just means they saw some value in the product but didn't feel enough motivation to actually follow through and signup/use the product.
This is similar in many ways to someone answering "it's too expensive". The value prop is either not strong enough, not being marketed well enough, too complicated to start using... or the product is solving a pain point that people don't care enough about to build a business around it. Which is a serious question the OP needs to ask themselves. Unless their traffic<costs>conversion rate ratio is sufficient.
You can't expect customers to articulate that everytime (10-20% seems about right to me) because most people aren't actually thinking their actions through when visiting a landing page. Especially when it's via an ad... not something they searched out on Google or via referral.
Even if they did tell you they wouldn't necessarily know why... because you're assuming it was a rational thought process, or something they spent time thinking through, which is rarely the case. Books about how customers acting 'irrational' [1] are very useful at explaining this and are important to always be considering when doing marketing/UX design.
[1] https://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expand...
No. They really aren't[1], and they really don't[2].
Changing your mind is very hard, and most people don't do it. Even if you have been trained to change your mind, the longer that you hold onto an idea, the harder it is to believe the idea to be false. There is a reason Neils Bohr stated "science progresses one death at a time."
You are likely reading this and coming up with a bunch of reasons that you are right, and I'm wrong. Likely: "You missed the point, You didn't talk about UX", or "The doctor was still condescending," or more likely there is some flaw in my argument that you immediately see[3]. These thoughts alone should give you a good idea that it is difficult to change your mind.
[1] http://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expande... [2] http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/i-dont-want... [3] It is also entirely possible that you don't think any of these things. It depends on how strongly you hold to the belief that you shared.
"Predictably Irrational" is a brilliant book about this subject. Consumers do not buy things rationally. And the answer is not simply exploitation by marketing companies (although that is a big part of the narrative).
http://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expande...
Predictably Irrational (Dan Ariely, he has some TED talks as well) http://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expande...
Influence, the Science of Persuasion (Robert Cialdini) http://www.amazon.com/Influence-ebook/dp/B002BD2UUC
[1] http://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expande...
http://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expande...
This is assuredly true, on the basis of replicated research, with regard to IQ. There is essentially no correlation between IQ and rationality.
http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/stanovich1/Engli...
High-IQ people can be every bit as irrational ("stupid" in the language of the submitted article) as low-IQ people, and worse still, not notice that they are being stupid. There are whole books on the subject.
http://www.amazon.com/Why-Smart-People-Can-Stupid/dp/0300101...
http://www.amazon.com/Blunder-Smart-People-Make-Decisions/dp...
http://www.amazon.com/Why-We-Make-Mistakes-Without/dp/076792...
http://www.amazon.com/Sway-Irresistible-Pull-Irrational-Beha...
http://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expande...
All we can do about that here on HN is take other people's comments seriously and try to see ourselves as others see us as we ponder our decisions.
He also talks about all the experiments he did to support such claims.
Mindware by Richard Nisbett - a researcher focusing on this for decades distills his best insight in a recent book.
https://www.amazon.com/Mindware-Tools-Thinking-Richard-Nisbe...
Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely - a classic book in the field.
https://www.amazon.com/Predictably-Irrational-Revised-Expand...