Your comments, however, seem to be locked into a single world view based on the assumed neccesity for unlimited growth.
This is blinkered, to say the least .. you might care to look at any of the many alternative thoughts on this matter,
eg: https://www.amazon.com.au/Small-Beautiful-Economics-People-M...
from waaaaay back in the 1970s.
We are not talking about shrinking back to zero, I am talking about world population finding a sustainable balnce, say five or seven billion by 2300 or so.
![Small Is Beautiful [Paperback] [Jan 01, 1993] E F Schumacher cover](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61JAszv40jL.jpg)
Your comments, however, seem to be locked into a single world view based on the assumed neccesity for unlimited growth.
This is blinkered, to say the least .. you might care to look at any of the many alternative thoughts on this matter,
eg: https://www.amazon.com.au/Small-Beautiful-Economics-People-M...
from waaaaay back in the 1970s.
We are not talking about shrinking back to zero, I am talking about world population finding a sustainable balnce, say five or seven billion by 2300 or so.