No, please let's not raise the idea that metatron.substack.com's non-expert interpretation of data is a waste of valuable expert time!

Wait, I should look at the author's (Joel Smalley) self-described qualifications before getting snarky:

Pro bono COVID data analysis for legal challenges and independent media seeking the truth (e.g. Dr Tess Lawrie's letter to the MHRA - https://bit.ly/3FZxpU7 and Robert Kennedy's book - https://amzn.to/3nMd2mK), shared publicly "for the greater good". https://substack.com/profile/30382446-joel-smalley

Yes, it is a waste of time. A reasonable presumption is that people are morons or liars unless shown otherwise.

> I very much doubt mainstream science is completely ignoring the panacea and preferring suboptimal solutions.

"Mainstream" medical science is driven by a massive conflict of interest due to relying on funding from pharmaceutical companies and bureaucrats with a financial interest in pharmaceutical companies. This is why for decades mainstream medical science insisted smoking was healthy. There's a great book on this: https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Children...

Author:

“Joel Smalley

Pro bono COVID data analysis for legal challenges and independent media seeking the truth (e.g. Dr Tess Lawrie's letter to the MHRA - https://bit.ly/3FZxpU7 and Robert Kennedy's book - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Childr...), shared publicly "for the greater good".”

I assume “Pro bono COVID data analysis” means “untrained hobbyist”.

If you find this interesting you may want to check out the Best Seller "The Real Anthony Fauci" [1] by Rober F. Kennedy Jr. Your jaw will likely drop while reading it. All the studies and source material is cited at the end of every chapter and you can review much of the clinical data and decide for yourself.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Children...

There are several studies showing positive effects of ivermectin in vivo. Here is one [0] two [1].

One potential problem with ivermectin is it's patent expired in 1996. So not a lot of money to be made from a generic treatment that is cheap and abundant.

How far would Big Pharma go to secure profits? [2] Find out for yourself. Warning ignorance really is bliss and your worldview may be shaken.

[0] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33592050/

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/

[2] https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Children...

The pandemic is an enormous cash cow and power grab. Going away? It's never going away, in the same way that the Patriot Act is never going away.

This book is a best seller at Amazon now for a reason:

https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Children...

Is there any research that it doesn't? I mean the guy is a well-known scientist, he can make educated claims can't he. Being apart of the team that created mRNA vaccines probably means he knows more then the average smuck about them...right? So why not take his claim seriously and figure out if its true or not.

For me, i'm young and healthy, im not at risk. Thats been demonstrated clearly now. For me, the risk of unknown long-term side effects related to the mRNA vaccine far outweigh my risk to covid. Also i just don't trust the profit incentives of modern big-pharma and big-science.

Read https://www.amazon.ca/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Pharma-Democracy/dp...