The problem I had was that Clinton's principal associate is Ira Magaziner, the same "intellectual" who was the schemer-in-chief behind "Hillary care" in 1993.
The problem I have is that Tom Peters is the same "intellectual" who continues to say less with more words that any other "business guru" on the lecture circuit.
Funny how often over the years he has been wrong with his McKinsey-like advice while the world changed under his feet.
Funnier is that the guy who skims the surface of everything, never digging down below one level is telling us hackers to act without realizing that this is one audience you can't bullshit.
Examples of Peters' charlatanism are everywhere. Just a few:
The problem I have is that Tom Peters is the same "intellectual" who continues to say less with more words that any other "business guru" on the lecture circuit.
Funny how often over the years he has been wrong with his McKinsey-like advice while the world changed under his feet.
Funnier is that the guy who skims the surface of everything, never digging down below one level is telling us hackers to act without realizing that this is one audience you can't bullshit.
Examples of Peters' charlatanism are everywhere. Just a few:
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/53/peters.html
http://www.sathnam.com/Features/31/tom-peters
http://www.amazon.com/Witch-Doctors-Making-Sense-Management/...