Deletion doesn't necessarily mean retraction. As far as I know, only a retraction strictly means retraction.
The article makes plenty of factual claims that remain factual whether the article is published or merely preserved.
Like:
"autism is caused by genetic mutations, not “vaccines” or “leaky gut” as [Kharrazian] states on p.327 and 409."
And sure enough: [“Why Do I Still Have Thyroid Symptoms? When My Lab Tests are Normal“] searchable at Amazon does indeed have the claim that autism might be a result of immune system reaction to vaccine. Sure sounds like a quack.
The article makes plenty of factual claims that remain factual whether the article is published or merely preserved.
Like: "autism is caused by genetic mutations, not “vaccines” or “leaky gut” as [Kharrazian] states on p.327 and 409."
And sure enough: [“Why Do I Still Have Thyroid Symptoms? When My Lab Tests are Normal“] searchable at Amazon does indeed have the claim that autism might be a result of immune system reaction to vaccine. Sure sounds like a quack.
https://www.amazon.com/Still-Thyroid-Symptoms-Tests-Normal/d...